TV on Web


Not that Tina Fey wasn’t busy enough these days winning all those Emmy awards for ’30-Rock’ while single-handily bringing back ‘SNL’ into relevant pop-culture. No, now she’s going to write a book too. “According to two publishing officials with knowledge of the negotiations, Little, Brown and Company will release a book of humorous essays by the 38-year-old Fey.” Even though I’m generally one to spend more time reading web articles than I am to read something in book form this is a book I’ll definitely want to pick up

Fey has proven that no matter what medium you work in if you make the content awesome people will still flock to it. Ratings for the premiere episode with Fey making her first foray into the Palin impersonation saw a 46% jump in ratings compared to the same episode last year. The top viewed Tina Fey video from SNL has already seen more than 3.2 million views. Count up the top 3 of those clips and you have over 7 million views. That’s almost as many people as the ’9 million people [who] tuned in to prime-time programs on the top five English-language broadcast networks the night they aired last week, a 4.3% decline from the first week of the 2007 TV season, according to Nielsen Media Research.’

Keep it up Fey, I know I can’t get enough ’30-Rock’ and I’ll be watching SNL tonight so I can see you, Queen Latifah and someone else make some sense of last Thursday’s VP debate.

Since SNL’s embed code isn’t working properly if you want to check out last week’s skit, or want to find tonight’s skit after it airs just click here.

 

UPDATE:

About 51 percent of viewers who saw at least one of the two Saturday Night Live skits featuring Tina Fey as Sarah Palin watched online, according to a survey by Solutions Research Group and reported today (Friday) by Advertising Age. The survey noted that of these, 23 percent watched it on YouTube; 17 percent on NBC.com, and 4 percent on Hulu.com (jointly owned by NBC and News Corp). 


Permalink  Trackback

NBC has added ‘Sunday Night Football Extra’ to their website. It enables viewers to watch the games but also allows extras such as alternative camera angles. Hans Schroeder, NFL vice president of digital media, says the webcasts “provide a new level of interactivity, with fans getting to chose how they experience NFL games.” The webcasts are live only and not archived for later viewing. This might change in the future but at least NBC is getting this right unlike the way the Olympic coverage went. Giving the audience more options and more control should bring a new audience of viewers to the table. A younger crowd who might not have access to a tv but they do have a computer.


Permalink  Trackback

I forgot to mention it earlier this week but TheWB.com went live. Maybe because the site is so poorly designed and has such a wasted use of quality content that enables me from writing my review of the site. I’ve got a few drafts I’ve written up and I even sent a letter to Brent with “The WB Team” that would make for a good review, but the site is so poor that I can’t get excited about it enough one way or another to post much more than this.

If you want to you can go check it out for yourself now. I have the feeling you’ll soon find yourself disapointed and back at hulu watching episodes of ’30 Rock’ starring that lady one post down, not that lady, the other one.


Permalink  Trackback

CBS 

Magid Media Labs, working for CBS Interactive, released a study that shows people who watch TV shows online are also watching them on broadcast networks. What, the online component won’t cannibalize the television audience? Well, who’dathunk that? Oh yeah, everyone! Not only does the internet not take away viewers from broadcast TV but it also adds viewers to shows they might never have caught before. By giving the viewing control back to the audience 35% surveyed said they used ‘the internet as a means of checking out shows that they have not seen before and are therefore likely to view them on TV as a result of the added exposure.”

By making content more accessible it increases awareness, and if the show is any good, interest and ratings. I’ve never seen an episode of ABC’s ‘Pushing Daisies’ on my TV. Honestly I don’t even know what day of the week it was on (Wednesday maybe?) but I’ve seen every episode of the show. I wouldn’t miss it. Very rarely do you find me, and according to ratings most of the population over the summer, sitting inside watching TV in the evening. Instead we’ll watch the shows when we find the time. I’ll watch commercials online no problem, I’d have to watch three times as many if I watched these shows on air anyway. I might as well be able to pick and choose when I watch them.

So, keep it up. Keep putting new shows online. Worst case scenario is you end up getting fans like me who’ll be annoyed that their favorite shows go into hibernation all summer. I guess that’s why we have premium cable channels and shows like ‘Weeds’, to fill the gaps.


Permalink  Trackback

I just got my username and password to access the beta site for TheWB.com. Sadly it requires a version of Adobe player that my work computer doesn’t have, and that I can’t install. As soon as I get a chance to check this new site out I’ll have a review up.


Permalink  Trackback

TheWB.com Logo 

That’s right folks, for all those who can’t live without ‘One Tree Hill’ and ‘Smallville’ you are in luck. Earlier this morning Warner Bros., unveiled that TheWB.com (full press release here) will return as an online platform. As of right now the site is set to begin beta testing in early May and as soon as I get access, much the way I did with hulu.com, I’ll be sure to let everyone here know what I think. I don’t know how much I care about the facebook integration but it’s a marketing ploy not used for hulu, which isn’t cracking into the top 100 websites anytime soon.

Lastly,  Variety is reporting that the group is also launching KidsWB.com which is a site only a child could love. For all my Looney Tunes needs I’ll stick to the site dedicated solely to them at LooneyTunes.WarnerBros.com.


Permalink  Trackback

Hulu went live today. For those of you who didn’t already have access to the site you can now check it out without having to log in. Check out our review from December here.


Permalink  Trackback

‘Sideways’ is playing on the other tab of my browser and I thought I should add that on top of hulu being a great place for on and off-air television shows it has slowly started to add several feature lenght films. From ‘October Sky’ from Universal to ‘Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World’. So far there is only a handful of feature length films but with Fox announcing a video rental deal with iTune’s yesterday we might see more films from the 90s showing up.


Permalink  Trackback

 

hulufrntpge.jpg

Merry Christmas from hulu. A homepage screenshot.

Finally, I present to you with limited interruptions, my review of hulu.com. I followed the instructions on how to ‘Sign up for the hulu private beta (currently limited to users in the U.S.)’ sometime in September and then I waited. I waited patiently as other major entertainment sites reviewed the site and hyping it as the next best thing. I continued to wait until the day my temporary login information finally arrived to my gmail account about a month later. I know, that means I’ve been enjoying hulu.com since the end of October and I’ve been so busy watching videos that I haven’t had time to write a full review until now.

The site is well organized, simple and effective. Visually pleasing and easy to navigate from show to show and to the next episode of the series you are watching. No pop-up window players here. The player loads within the same page, in a somewhat classy letterbox view. A title and brief description of the video appears above the player and a small rectangle ad in the upper right. Related videos and viewer comments below on video clips and other episodes from that season are below the player on full episodes. The player reveals options when it is ‘moused-over’ such as the option to play the video in a “pop-out” window, to go full-screen, and to “lower lights” of the rest of the page (a clever feature that adds to the aesthetics of the viewing experience).

huluplayermenus.jpg

Tina Fey in ’30-Rock’ with displayed menu options.

Currently video playback can range from perfectly clean and crisp, even full-screen on a cinema display, to downright un-watchable on any screen. Much like when ABC.com launched their video player playback can be choppy and what little buffering the player does isn’t much help. The site is still beta testing so I’ll let minor playback glitches like that slide, but the HD videos are even slower to load and experience even more choppiness than regular videos. This presents a more fundamental problem for hulu on how to achieve proper streaming videos with HD quality. That’s one problem I’ll leave up to the experts.

The greatest aspect of hulu, and what I think puts it ahead of ABC, is seamless play. The spots that run during your episode are generally 15 seconds long with the occasional 30-second spot and they play within the original player. Your video automatically starts back up when the spot is done running which means no more clicking ‘continue’ or intrusive and loud spots to interfere with your enjoyment. It is what online television should be… TV online. You watch the same shows and in the same format but on your computer and with DVD like pausing, fast-forwarding, and rewinding capabilities.

The only thing that could possibly rival seamless playback is the selection that hulu has to offer. From the ‘A-team’ and ‘Alfred Hitchcock Presents’ to ‘The Riches’ and ’30-Rock’. The selection is massive, spans decades and encompasses NBC’s and News Corps. broad reach of stations (including FX, USA, Bravo, NBC, Fox and more).

hulubrowsetitle.jpg

Did someone say ‘St. Elsewhere’?

ABC might have been first but this new, and surprising, pairing between these two media giants has upped the bar. It really was the only way to try and compete against ABC and iTune’s. Why buy a show on iTune’s when I can stream it for free in roughly the same quality (and limited interruptions)? While I’ve never been a big purchaser of single episodes of TV shows online I am an avid watcher of streaming shows on ABC.com (I’ve only ever seen my new favorite show ‘Pushing Daisies’ online) and have joined the ranks of the many other hulu fans helping out with the beta testing.

Hulu might not yet be open to the public, but hopefully once it is they can get past the strange name and figure out that it is a great portal for quality content in a simple and elegant player. It isn’t everyday I root for something that is competing against a Disney product, but maybe this will make their site better, and bring on some old school Disney content. Hulu really is that good. If anything the site is a little plain but I prefer facebook to myspace, so that should say a lot as well.


Permalink  Trackback

Here’s some news that might help bring my Disney stock out of its 52-week low. Not only did shows like ‘Dancing with the Stars’ and ‘Desperate Housewives’ help to unseat CBS from the ‘November Sweeps Week’ throne but, as reported earlier, ABC is also #1 of the major networks online. The alphabet beat out NBC’s 41% and not so surprisingly the 17% who said they go to YouTube for missed programming. The survey was conducted by Nielsen and comes at a time when digital viewer ship is getting more press than ever before (see strike). Only 25% said they had even watched an entire episode of a TV show online. Curiously no figure was listed for people who had watched only part of a TV show.

 

abccom-hd.jpg

 

In other somewhat related news. Hulu.com has gone hi-def. Universal provided five trailers/clips and 20thCentury Fox provided another 5. These HD clips are apparently ad free but I have yet to view one on my own. It is possible that  while trying to compete with the HD programming offered by ABC hulu is also using a similar ad campaign strategy and airing ads based on impressions only and not a set duration or they just want their hi-def content to be ad-free. Look for a full Hulu.com review before Christmas.


Permalink  Trackback

Next Page »