Google


Time Life magazine has partnered up with search giant Google (let’s just call them the inventors of ‘teh internets’ from now on), aka the library killer, to compile their images onto an easily search-able database. I’ve geeked out over vintage 1950s Disneyland pictures, and it’s only been live since Tuesday. Software engineer Paco Galanes wrote on Google’s blog that “this effort to bring offline images online was inspired by our mission to organize all the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” This marks a revival of sorts for the discontinued magazine that ran from 1883 to 2006.

Google and Life Together
Google and Life together forever


Permalink  Trackback

Short post ’cause it’s late and dinner is ready.  Jason D. is in Cali this week but if he wasn’t I know for sure he’d be posting about the fact that Google released Google Earth today for the iPhone.  I just downloaded it so I’ll give first impressions later.  Pull up the App Store and enjoy!


Permalink  Trackback

Ever watch a video on YouTube and been inspired to buy the album? Instead of using iTunes to listen to :30s previews of songs do you often find yourself on YouTube listening to the entire thing? What about video game trailers; I know I geeked out when I watched ‘Halo 3′ ads when they first came out. I was watching anything I could with the Master Chief running around and blowing things up. Lucky for you YouTube has the answer to all your purchasing needs.

YouTube Blog

YouTube Blog

This past Tuesday YouTube announced on their blog that they would be ‘taking our first steps to providing YouTube users with this kind of instant gratification, by adding “click-to-buy” links to the watch pages of thousands of YouTube partner videos.” The post goes on to say that the links will be non-obtrusive and placed beneath the video with the rest of the community features that have led to YouTube’s great success. To start they will be ‘embedding iTunes and Amazon.com links on videos from companies like EMI Music, and providing Amazon.com product links to the newly released video game Spore(TM) on videos from Electronic Arts.”

This is naturally just the beginning as the site slowly shifts to become a strong eCommerce platform for the company. When Google purchased YouTube it wasn’t entirely clear what their motivation was. Why spend so much money on a site that was drawing huge traffic numbers, but not as many advertising dollars? Well, I think we’ve found our answer. As this develops further and we see more and more product links attached with videos the site will become half user generated nonsense (as it always has been) and half corporate sponsored commercials. If only MTV had a way to have done this for television 10 years ago.


Permalink  Trackback

Google & T-Mobile: G1 Phone

Google & T-Mobile: G1 Phone

Today Google announced the first phone running on the Android platform.  It’s the G1, made by HTC (makers of many popular Windows Mobile devices).  The G1 will be available exclusively from T-Mobile stores in U.S. cities where they’ve depolyed their 3G data network.  You’ll be able to order the phone online and it will work in the non-3G areas, but at slower speeds (or you can switch to the built-in WiFi).  

The phone has drawn many comparisons to Apple’s iPhone.  At first glance, it’s pretty similar, with large and bright touch screen (full features, and more detailed features from Fortune).  But unlike the iPhone, the G1 features a full QWERTY keyboard beneath the screen.  It will also have a cheaper data plan than AT&T’s iPhone plan.  The phone itself can be had for $179 which is $20 less than the cheapest iPhone.  

 

G1 Sideways Opening Keyboard

G1 Sideways Opening Keyboard

 

 

That being said, the G1 doesn’t yet support Exchange push, which the iPhone does with the release of the iPhone 2.0 software.   There will be an applications store where users can download new apps.  G1 users will be able to download music from a special Amazon.com store–directly to the device and DRM-free.

That’s all good, but it appears to only come with a 1GB memory card–I wasn’t able to find the specs on the built-in memory.  While it may be $20 cheaper than an iPhone, but they come in 8GB and 16GB versions, so you’re going to spend a lot more than that buying 7GB worth of memory cards to store the other part of your music library.  While their website says “With the 1GB memory card, youll never be without your favorite tunes,” I’m willing to bet many will feel differently.  Also, is it me, or do all the home screen flick interactions seem very iPhone-esque?

Either way, I’m sure there will be a lot of people who will be eager to get their hands on the device.  It will be interesting to see if and when lines start forming.


Permalink  Trackback

 

Google Android

 

Google’s releasing the first Android phone tomorrow through T-Mobile.  But C|NET’s got an interesting article talking about the possibility that Android could make its way into more devices than just your phone.  Unlike the iPhone, Google has created Android as a platform–it’s not device specific.  For instance, Android could crop up in home appliances or automobiles.  When will Android take on Windows Media Center PC Edition?  I’m not sure…nor am I sure I really care…at least not yet.


Permalink  Trackback

Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google–which owns Blogger–this week finally created a blog.  The blog’s first post, which can be found at http://too.blogspot.com/, reveals that Sergy is predisposed to be at greater risk for Parkinson’s Disease.  He found this out through the genetic testing company co-founded by his wife, 23andMe (”genetics just got personal).

Interestingly, Brin’s got no comments so far on his blog.  I’m not sure if they’re turned off, or if no one has felt compelled to comment yet.  Probably the first option.  

The blog is titled “Too”, which Brin explains:

Welcome to my personal blog. While Google is a play on googol, too is a play on the much smaller number - two. It also means “in addition”, as this blog reflects my life outside of work.

Frankly, I’m hoping that future posts won’t just be plugs for Google or affiliated companies.  Reading the post, while he does talk about the fact that he carries the G20195 mutation which puts him at greater risk for Parkinson’s, I got the sense that the post was more of an advertisement for how great 23andMe is.  Then again, it’s his blog, and he can do whatever the hell he wants with it.


Permalink  Trackback

Via Engadget, Google along with T-Mobile, will unveil the first “Googlephone”–a phone running on Google’s Android platform.  This will pit Google/T-Mobile in direct competition with AT&T and Apple.  I wonder if Google will remain the default browser in Safari 4…


Permalink  Trackback

 

Aw, Snap!  Sad Tab!

Aw, Snap! Sad Tab!

I haven’t yet run into Sad Tab through the course of browsing the web using Google’s Chrome.  That being said, I wanted to see it for myself.  Turns out this is really easy to do.  Just type in

 

about:crash

into the Chrome Omnibar and BAM!  Sad Tab!  How awesome is that!?  He really does look sad.  There’s a lot of other pretty cool stuff you can do with the about: commands.  Check out this page for a more exhausitive list.


Permalink  Trackback

Google Chrome

Chrome freakin’ rocks.  At least that’s my first impression so far.  

After a relatively quick download and install from the Chrome Beta site, I was up and running last night with Google’s new browser.

What I was instantly blown away by was how snappy the browser was.  From loading the browser in the first place, to opening new tabs, to opening heavy pages on the Internet, Chrome just seems zippy.  Forget that…it doesn’t seem zippier, it is.  Especially on JavaScript and media heavy sites.

 One of the first thoughts I had when I started using the browser was, “Ohh, so this is what Web 2.0 is supposed to be like.”  No long waits for bloated websites to sluggishly try and render in IE.  Remember back in the day when you first experienced the web over a true high-speed Internet connection?  It’s like that again.

My companies website, which I know is very JavaScript heavy, loads much, much faster in Chrome.  Gmail seems to open almost instantly.  I’m reminded of arriving at the University of Washington and downloading MP3s via Napster–often the download would be done before the % complete bar would even display.  That’s the feeling I get surfing with Chrome.  

The UI is very minimal.  Or at least it feels that way.  Perhaps it takes up just as much toolbar space as IE 6 and 7, but it doesn’t feel that way.  The integrated address/search/everything bar is pretty slick as well…just start typing what you want.  The bar is smart enough to know if you’re searching or looking for a website in your history.  Furthermore, Google’s top-search suggestions are displayed when it recognizes you’re typing a search.  And the intelligent filtering seems to be a lot smoother than the jarring redraws you see with Firefox 3.

Google Chrome: New Tab

The new tab window seems just…smart.  Why wasn’t this done before?  When you open a new tab, Google displays thumbnails of your most-frequently (or most-recently?  I’m not sure yet…) sites, so with a simple click you can navigate to your favorite locations.  If you think about it, you’re really often only going to a handful of sites each day, and now those will be easily accessible.

I haven’t checked, but I assume that Google has provided me a way to access these sites without having to pick up my hands from the keyboard and use the mouse.  I need to explore what kind of keyboard shortcuts Chrome offers.  The keyboard shortcuts are one of the reasons I find Gmail so easy to use–I am constantly frustrated when Outlook doesn’t understand “g-i” means I want to go back to my Inbox.  Bah!

 

Google Chrome: Incognito

Now, Minyanville ran a story regarding IE 8’s new “porn mode”–aka private browsing or what MS refers to as “InPrivate.”  This feature is not new to the browsing world, with Firefox, Safari, and Camino all having had similar features for quite some time.  Minyanville, referencing a Financial Times article, insinuated that this would somehow take a hit out of Google’s search engine revenue.  Because of course all those people out there in Teh Internets are constantly being mindful of their browsing behavior and the kind of data that Google is collecting–and thusly they’ll always browse “InPrivate”–cutting off some valuable data for Google’s search algorithms.

I dont’ think this really going to be an issue however.  Firstly, even if you’re browsing “InPrivate” and you make a search via Google, Google’s obviously going to have your search term, and can still target ads.  Furthermore, Google built in an “Incognito” mode into Chrome.  And they did some interesting things with it.  Their implementation is not all-or-nothing.  You can start a new window in “Incognito” mode, or you can right click a link and open the link in a new window that way.  The mode is denoted by a rather incognito looking dude in the top of the window and a different colored frame than the default browser.  The mode will not keep a history, and will automagically delete all associated browsing data, including cookies, when the tab/window is closed–not just when you restart the browser.  So you can surf half your windows privately while keeping the other windows in a normal mode.  Buying a surprise gift?  Surfing hot trample porn?  Sweet!  No need to clear your entire browsing history and leave a telltale indication to anyone who is snooping you history.

 

Google Chrome: Memory usage

And to end my first impressions of Chrome, while I have to say the browser feels faster and snappier overall, it does appear to use more memory than Firefox.  Google claimed that because of the sandboxing of each window and tab–each run as a separate process, allowing a crashed tab to not bring down the entire browser or OS–there is a larger memory overhead to being with.  But as they’ve revamped a lot of the garbage collection in the code, over time the overhead will pay off because other browsers will get bloated and not reallocate unused memory.  In initial testing, I opened the same windows in Chrome and Firefox 3, and got about 100MB in memory usage out of Chrome (across all Chrome processes) compared to only about 63MB of usage in Firefox.  What I haven’t had a chance to do yet is run both FF and Chrome all day, and find out which is more bloated after a whole day’s usage (I doubt my Windows box will get through the whole day without some other issue or update causing a reboot, so this test might best be left to someone else). 

In all, Chrome rocks.  Download it, use it, love it.  At least for now.  And at least until IE 8 comes along and you’re forced to use it to log into some arcane corporate intranet tool.  Damn those IE-only sites…


Permalink  Trackback

Sad Mac

Sad Mac

For years, Mac users have had the love/hate relationship with the adorable Sad Mac icon.  It’s cute.  But it usually sucks when you see it.

Despite being a generally bad omen when you see it, there’s quite a culture which has grown up around the iconic icon.  And it sure is a lot nicer to look at than the standard Windows Blue Screen of Death.

With the introduction of Google Chrome however, the Sad Mac will finally have some company in the form of Sad Tab.

Sad Tab will appear whenever a tab is corrupted in the browser.  Chrome threads each tab as a separate process, so if one tab fails it won’t bring down the whole window or the entire browser (actually, each tab is technically its own browser).  The good news is that Sad Tab shouldn’t cause you to schedule a trip to your local Genius Bar.

Sad Tab

Sad Tab


Permalink  Trackback

Next Page »